The Essential Stein for Congress 2010-2012
Congress: 2010-2012
I Slander LoBi
Posted 10/15/2010 I Slander LoBiondo.
To the editor of the free local paper who wouldn't print this "letter to the editor" or whatever it was you invited me to write: I'm sorry you felt that my letter exceeded the bounds of what's proper from a long shot candidate who's taking on a self satisfied incumbent who won't answer to anybody in the district this year.... by debating ... by answering any questionnaires when directly asked to do so by several newspapers; and who won't attend any candidate forums either. My letter was possibly a little too much. And I'm no professional writer ... and I have no money to spend, and no time to play nice guy. Thank you
____________________________________________
Gary,
Unfortunately
at this time we cannot print your letter to the editor. It is a
slander ad instead of a letter to the editor. If you would like to
place this as an ad we can still get it in the paper for this month.
Please let us know by 10 am on Wednesday.
Thanks,
******* Editorial Staff
____________________________________
.
____________________________________
.
Hi,
my name is Gary Stein. Thanks Gazette, for an opportunity to introduce
my candidacy. I'm Frank LoBiondo's bare bones, non party backed--
Democratic opponent --plain and simple. If you'd like to know the details
why I'm bothering when so many have failed, please visit my web site.
Veterans especially, please visit the page called, "Tale Of The Tape."
Notice what's first, immediately after I give our respective ages. For non-veterans, don't bother, it's about the Troop Surge in Iraq.
Anyway, here's an idea, a reason to vote for me-- and it's something btw, I haven't posted on a very thorough web site- although I've thought about this idea many times. If I'm elected, I propose having the largest Congressional staff allowed by law- working for YOU. What politician would celebrate spending tax payer money that way? I would, it makes sense! Frank likes to brag he has one of the smallest staffs. He says he returns money to the Treasury. I believe him. Perhaps it offsets some of the wasteful pork he brings to the district? Earmarks are nothing more, nothing less, then the good old boy Washington-- I wash your back if you wash mine --we can no longer afford. It's one reason the Tea Party was born. Mr. LoBiondo seeks out earmarks, although he does steer clear of truly ridiculous ones. Voters somewhere else, might challenge the assertion that our earmarks are more worthy than theirs. Constituent problems are universal. I'd focus on that.
My large staff-- a group I'll have direct control over --won't be busy scheduling fund raisers either, worrying about the next election (the way his staff does) because I didn't raise any money this election, and I wouldn't raise a nickel in 2012. This is all contingent on changing many minds this year, and you voting for me.
Continuing the thought. The idea of a large staff-- and one staffer will help with my travel schedule (beginning 12 months after I'm sworn in) because if I'm elected --the fact I pulled off the impossible will encourage others, somewhere, maybe even here --to also consider taking on entrenched incumbents in 2012. I'll campaign for them, and still take on challengers here, if you elect me in 2010.
Finally, most importantly, my large staff will be local, near you, their master, ready to work on unsnaggling any problems you have with bureaucratic bungling in the public.........and private sector! A large staff also means I created several jobs out of thin air for several locals, working and living, right here in the district. Frank's chosen to pass on that- 16 years running. Frank has a reputation for good constituent services. That's good P.R. on his part. My staffer would work just as hard, if not harder, and there’d be several more staffers besides. Please, cast your vote carefully. Thank-you.
. Anyway, here's an idea, a reason to vote for me-- and it's something btw, I haven't posted on a very thorough web site- although I've thought about this idea many times. If I'm elected, I propose having the largest Congressional staff allowed by law- working for YOU. What politician would celebrate spending tax payer money that way? I would, it makes sense! Frank likes to brag he has one of the smallest staffs. He says he returns money to the Treasury. I believe him. Perhaps it offsets some of the wasteful pork he brings to the district? Earmarks are nothing more, nothing less, then the good old boy Washington-- I wash your back if you wash mine --we can no longer afford. It's one reason the Tea Party was born. Mr. LoBiondo seeks out earmarks, although he does steer clear of truly ridiculous ones. Voters somewhere else, might challenge the assertion that our earmarks are more worthy than theirs. Constituent problems are universal. I'd focus on that.
My large staff-- a group I'll have direct control over --won't be busy scheduling fund raisers either, worrying about the next election (the way his staff does) because I didn't raise any money this election, and I wouldn't raise a nickel in 2012. This is all contingent on changing many minds this year, and you voting for me.
Continuing the thought. The idea of a large staff-- and one staffer will help with my travel schedule (beginning 12 months after I'm sworn in) because if I'm elected --the fact I pulled off the impossible will encourage others, somewhere, maybe even here --to also consider taking on entrenched incumbents in 2012. I'll campaign for them, and still take on challengers here, if you elect me in 2010.
Finally, most importantly, my large staff will be local, near you, their master, ready to work on unsnaggling any problems you have with bureaucratic bungling in the public.........and private sector! A large staff also means I created several jobs out of thin air for several locals, working and living, right here in the district. Frank's chosen to pass on that- 16 years running. Frank has a reputation for good constituent services. That's good P.R. on his part. My staffer would work just as hard, if not harder, and there’d be several more staffers besides. Please, cast your vote carefully. Thank-you.
so called "stink bugs" Stein the following year (2011) running Stein, LoBiondo & Boyce
invade S. Jersey for State Assembly
